Healthcare Marketing: Internet is Woman’s Best Friend

February 11, 2011

Women turn to the internet for health information over family, friends or doctors.

Women are uncomfortable discussing health concerns with other family members, friends, doctors or even spouses.  And as a result they turn to the internet for information and answers.  iVillage conducted an online poll for Harris Interactive, which revealed women’s dependence on the internet for health concerns.

Some of the results from the survey are:

  • 82% of women are uncomfortable discussing health concerns with family and friends
  • 62% are twice as likely to turn to the web over their own mothers about health issues
  • 64% use online communities to discuss health concerns
  • 49% stated that online would be the first place they would go to research health issues.  More than twice the amount who would go to their doctor first (25%) or family (15%) or friends (6%).
  • 30% gather information from online communities to prepare them for their doctor’s visit.

These results verify women’ s dependence on the web for health information.  Healthcare marketers must recognize this and develop web strategies for communicating to women. Robust web sites, web advertising and the development of social networking sites are some of the tools that may be used to reach women.  Even directing consumers to existing websites can be helpful in creating relationships and building strong brand perceptions.

Women are traditionally viewed as the primary influencer and decision maker in regards to their family’s health.  As they increasingly turn to the web for valuable information, healthcare marketers must recognize it and create ways to meet them there.


Share


Hospital Marketing: Boomers’ Use of Social Media is Booming

February 10, 2011

Baby Boomers who provide care for aging parents are heavier users of social media than boomers in general.


Baby boomers are embracing social media.  Faster than any other segment. According to Pew Internet the number of 50-plus who use social networking sites grew 88% during the past year.  Now practically half of the adults over 50 regularly use social media.   In the more narrow 50-65 age group its almost three fourths.   Healthcare marketers are learning that social media can be a very effective way of reaching and connecting with baby boomers.

But those boomers who are caregivers to aging parents are even more likely to embrace and use social media. Age Lessons partnering with Comscore found that approximately 15.5 million of the 78 million boomers are caregivers.  They are split 60/40 female to male and the level of care ranges from daily phone check-ins to live-in help.

As reported by Matt Carmichael in Ad Age these boomer caregivers use social media an average of 150 minutes a month and view 70% more pages than average internet users. They are dependent on social networking sites for information because they have so little time for other types of socializing.  Their free time is limited and they are often restricted by the demands of caring for their parent(s).  It is often the easiest and fastest way to stay connected with family and friends.  They also use social media to validate and reinforce their feelings by finding others in similar situations and communities that provide support and encouragement.

The study also found this group is more likely to use the internet to find information, conduct research and make purchases.  The top sites for boomer caregivers are Facebook with a 91% reach, Amazon with 76% and Wal-Mart at 41%.  Twitter has 21% reach.

These caregivers are important influencers and decision-makers for not only their own immediate family’s health concerns but also for their parents.  This makes this group especially important to healthcare marketers.

Marketing to niches can be very effective.  They are more easily identifiable and the message can be very focused.  The use of social media, especially Facebook – whether in the form of a page or ad, can be extremely useful tools reaching this key demographic.


Healthcare Marketing: To Facebook or Not to Facebook? That is the Question

January 30, 2011

Six considerations when determining if your hospital should have a Facebook page. 

Everybody’s got them.  Or so it seems.  And if your hospital doesn’t have a Facebook fan page you’re not hip.  Not with it.  Out of touch and out of step.   That seems to be the prevailing attitude.  And quite frankly there is some truth to it.  But there are some points to be considered before jumping in and throwing up a Facebook page.

A Facebook page can be very effective.  It can help you attract new patients, build loyalty for your brand, educate consumers and build relationships.  But if not done correctly, it may not be worth the effort and can even do harm to your brand.

Shel Holtz with Holtz Communication + Technology writing for ragan.com identified six questions that should be answered before launching a Facebook page.  They are very appropriate for healthcare marketers.

1. Who do you want to become a fan, or like, your Facebook page?

You don’t want just anybody.  Or everybody. There is a target audience you would like to attract.  They may be prospects or current users of your brand.  They may be special interests groups or a certain demographic.  Whomever it may be, they need to be clearly defined before launching a page.

2. What will these audiences expect from your page?

You should have a clear vision of what your target audience wants from liking you.  And the content should give them exactly what they want.  Otherwise you will disappoint an audience that is very important to you.

3. Who else might be attracted to your page?

You may be successful in attracting the very people you want on your page.  But you might also attract others as well.  Are there individuals or groups who are activists and who might want to take issue with your organization?  Do not launch a site unless you are willing to be vulnerable and have a transparent dialogue with those people.  And are you willing to tolerate the things they may post on the site?

4. Who will have the responsibility of caring and feeding the page?

Is there someone who has the time and desire to feed the page?  To keep a page current, to meet expectations, to build relationships and to fulfill your objections someone(s) must take the time to care for it and feed it.  Regularly and consistently.  Too often hospitals launch a page and then the marketing department gets involved in a hundred other things and the page is neglected or abandoned.  If this is the likely result, don’t launch a page.

5. Who will monitor the page?

When fans post questions or make comments, who will be monitoring the page to respond?  And is that person empowered to gather the necessary information to response and speak for the organization?

6. Do you have a contingency plan for unanticipated activity?

Do you have a plan to put into action if a crisis occurs or if persons or groups attempt to be disruptive?  You can’t afford to be unprepared for tough situations that might arise.

Surely there are other considerations as well.  But these are a few key ones that should be addressed.  Yes, Facebook can be a very effective means of communicating and building relationships.  But if not done right, it can also cause harm to your brand. Marketers should have adequate answers to each of the questions listed above before launching into the exciting but risky areas of social networking.

Share


Healthcare Marketing: Are We Overreacting When We Respond to Consumer Complaints?

January 30, 2011

After receiving resistance to their new logo, Gap went back to the old logo.  Did they overreact?  Patient Complaint

After undoubtedly a series of focus groups and extensive research, Gap decided it needed to change its logo.  They wanted a more contemporary look that was current but yet honored its heritage.  A tremendous amount of research and work went into developing the updated logo.  So Gap introduced it’s new logo on it’s website.  But four days later reversed the decision and returned to their original logo.

The change occurred because consumers took issue with the new mark and voiced their disapproval using various social networking sites.  The reaction was strong and fervent.  So four days later, Gap president Marka Hansen announced the logo change was being rescinded and the company was returning to the original logo.

Many people praised Gap for listening to its customers and paying attention to their concerns.  And for responding rapidly and answering the consumers’ requests.  It’s the way marketing works today.  Consumers are in control. They voice their opinions and solicit others in the network to join the crusade.  And a company is highly regarded for listening to consumers and responding to their concerns and wishes.  Everything you read about marketing today would affirm that GAP did exactly as it should.

Maybe that’s true.  But maybe not.  Was all the research conducted by Gap about their logo just wrong?  Was it bogus?  Did the resistance merit abandoning the new logo?  Were those complaining brand loyalists?  Would those who resisted the change stop buying Gap clothing?  Is it no longer strategically important to update the logo for the future?

A survey commissioned by AdAge and conducted by Ipsos Observer found that 80% of consumers had no idea the logo had changed.  Is it possible to put too much emphasis on consumer social networking responses?  Do consumers know what is best strategically for a company’s future success?  Are consumers always right?   What happens when Gap someday raises prices to remain economically feasible and they meet resistance in social media?  Do they sacrifice the company’s financial health because some consumers express dissatisfaction?

This real life example raises questions about how much influence unsolicited consumers should have on your brand.  I don’t have all the answers.  I commend Gap for listening and responding to consumers.  That’s the value of social media.  But I also cringe somewhat because they caved to the wishes of a relatively small amount of consumers.  I wonder why some opinionated consumers who didn’t like the new logo trumped all the research that had indicated an update was needed.

Healthcare marketers should listen to consumers.  They should be responsive to consumer feedback and input.  But should they forsake research findings and strategic planning for the wishes of a small percentage of customers?  I know social media experts say we should respond quickly to consumer complaints but I would have liked to have known who the complainers actually were (consumers or non-consumers) and if they were consumers who would have stopped buying Gap products because of the logo change.

Social media is helpful and exciting. But should it hijack and derail strategic planning that’s based on solid research?  It’s a serious dilemma and deserves further consideration and study.

Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 96 other followers